Evaluation of volleyball achievement development program at the Riau Indonesia province student education and training center

Abstract

This study was used to evaluate the coaching program at Student Education and Training Center, Riau Province in volleyball using the CIPP model (Context, Input, Process, Product) using indicators which include: (1) Program Background, (2) Development Program Objectives, (3) Coaching Program, (4) Trainers, (5) Athletes, (6) Parents, (7) Budget Sources, (8) Facilities and Infrastructure, (9) Coaching Process, (10) Monitoring, (11) Achievements. This research uses the mix method. The subjects in this study were Volleyball PPLP Riau Province Branch. 2 Managers, 2 Coaches and 14 Athletes. Data collection was carried out using questionnaires, interviews, and documentation. The results of the evaluation of the context evaluation were concluded in the sufficient category with the context based on the management getting a percentage of 100% and based on the trainers the category was sufficient 50% and less than 50%. The results of the input evaluation are in the sufficient category with a percentage of 50% and in the less category with a percentage of 50% based on management, the evaluation of input based on trainers is in the sufficient category with a percentage of 50%. and poor category with a percentage of 50%, input evaluation based on athletes 7.1% good category, 71.4% in the sufficient category and 21.4% in the less category, input assessment based on parents in the sufficient category with a percentage of 100%, input evaluation based on budget sources in the adequate category with a percentage of 100%, and input evaluation based on facilities and infrastructure in the sufficient category with a percentage of 100%. The results of the process evaluation were concluded in the sufficient category with a percentage of 100% based on the coaching program and process evaluation based on the implementation of the coaching program in the sufficient category with a percentage of 50% and the less category with a percentage of 50%. The results of the product evaluation were concluded in the very good category with a percentage of 67% and 33% in the very bad category based on achievement.