Effects of playing surface on physiological, technical, and mood parameters in 5v5 small-sided soccer games in youth players

Authors

Keywords:

Playing surface, psychophysiological responses, small-sided games, technical performance

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to compare the psychophysiological, kinematic, and technical responses of young soccer players during 5v5 small-sided games (SSGs) performed on artificial turf and natural grass surfaces. Method: Twenty male soccer players (age: 12.2 ± 0.41 years) participated in two experimental sessions conducted under standardized environmental conditions (29 °C, 40% humidity). Each player completed four 5-minute SSG bouts with 2-minute recovery intervals on both surface types, separated by 48 hours of rest. Total distance, mean heart rate (HRmean), peak heart rate (HRpeak), percentage of maximum heart rate (%HRmax), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and physical enjoyment scale (PES) as well as technical actions and mood responses (Brunel Mood Scale; BRUMS) were recorded. Paired-sample t-tests were applied, and significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: No significant differences were observed between surfaces in HRmean, HRpeak, %HRmax, RPE, PES, or total distance covered (p > 0.05). However, players performed significantly more successful passes, successful shots, interceptions, and ball losses on artificial turf than on natural grass (p < 0.05). Mood responses were largely independent of surface type, although minor effects were noted, including tension and vigour (p > 0.05). Conclusion: While the psychophysiological load of 5v5 SSGs was similar on both surfaces, technical performance was superior on artificial turf. These findings suggest that surface type has a greater impact on technical execution than on physiological or psychological responses during SSGs in young soccer players.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andersson, H., Ekblom, B., & Krustrup, P. (2008). Elite football on artificial turf versus natural grass: movement patterns, technical standards, and player impressions. J Sport Sci, 26(2), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410701422076

Arslan, E., Kilit, B., Clemente, F. M., Soylu, Y., Sögüt, M., Badicu, G., Akca, F., Gokkaya, M., & Murawska-Ciałowicz, E. (2021). The effects of exercise order on the psychophysiological responses, physical and technical performances of young soccer players: combined small-sided games and high-ıntensity ınterval training. Biology (Basel), 10(11), 1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10111180

Bradley, P. S., Sheldon, W., Wooster, B., Olsen, P., Boanas, P., & Krustrup, P. (2009). High-intensity running in English FA Premier League soccer matches. J Sport Sci, 27(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410802512775

Brito, Â., Roriz, P., Silva, P., Duarte, R., & Garganta, J. (2017). Effects of pitch surface and playing position on external load activity profiles and technical demands of young soccer players in match play. Int J Perf Anal Spor, 17(6), 902–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2017.1407207

Brito, J., Krustrup, P., & Rebelo, A. (2012). The influence of the playing surface on the exercise intensity of small-sided recreational soccer games. Hum Mov Sci, 31(4), 946–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2011.08.011

Burillo, P., Gallardo, L., Felipe, J. L., & Gallardo, A. M. (2014). Artificial turf surfaces: perception of safety, sporting feature, satisfaction and preference of football users. Eur J Sport Sci, 14 Suppl 1, S437–S447. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2012.713005

Clemente, F.M., Afonso, J., Castillo, D., Los Arcos, A., Silva, A., & Sarmento, H. (2020). The effects of small-sided soccer games on tactical behavior and collective dynamics: a systematic review. Chaos Soliton Fract, 134, 109710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109710

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd edn Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale.

Di Michele, R., Di Renzo, A. M., Ammazzalorso, S., & Merni, F. (2009). Comparison of physiological responses to an incremental running test on treadmill, natural grass, and artificial turf in young soccer players. J Strength Cond Res, 23(3), 939-945. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a07b6e

Dragoo, J. L., & Braun, H. J. (2010). The effect of playing surface on injury rate: a review of the current literature. Sports Med, 40(11), 981–990. https://doi.org/10.2165/11535910-000000000-00000

Folgado, H., Duarte, R., Laranjo, L., Sampaio, J., & Fernandes, O. (2007). Heart rate and technical responses to variation in pitch dimension and surface in ‘‘three-a-side’’youth soccer drills. Retrieved 20 January, 2013, from http://hdl.handle.net/10174/2086

Fuller, C. W., Dick, R. W., Corlette, J., & Schmalz, R. (2007). Comparison of the incidence, nature and cause of injuries sustained on grass and new generation artificial turf by male and female football players. Part 1: match injuries. Br J Sports Med, 41 Suppl 1(Suppl 1), i20–i26. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2007.037267

Hughes, M. G., Birdsey, L., Meyers, R., Newcombe, D., Oliver, J. L., Smith, P. M., Stembridge, M., Stone, K., & Kerwin, D. G. (2013). Effects of playing surface on physiological responses and performance variables in a controlled football simulation. J Sports Sci, 31(8), 878–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.757340

Kanaras, V., Metaxas, T. I., Mandroukas, A., Gissis, I., Zafeiridis, A., Riganas, C. S., ... & Vrabas, I. S. (2014). The effect of natural and artificial grass on sprinting performance in young soccer players. Am J Sports Sci, 2(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20140201.11

Kutnjak, M., Pavlinovic, V., & Modric, T. (2024). The effect of pitch surface on match running performance in women’s soccer. Appl Sci, 15(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15010040

Little, T., & Williams, A. G. (2005). Specificity of acceleration, maximum speed, and agility in professional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res, 19(1), 76-78. https://doi.org/10.1519/14253.1

Luo, G., & Stefanyshyn, D. (2011). Identification of critical traction values for maximum athletic performance. Footwear Sci, 3(3), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424280.2011.639807

López-Fernández, J., Gallardo, L., Fernández-Luna, Á., Villacañas, V., García-Unanue, J., & Sánchez-Sánchez, J. (2019). Pitch size and game surface in different small-sided games. Global indicators, activity profile, and acceleration of female soccer players. J Strength Cond Res, 33(3), 831-838. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002090

López-Fernández, J., Sánchez-Sánchez, J., Rodríguez-Cañamero, S., Ubago-Guisado, E., Colino, E., & Gallardo, L. (2018). Physiological responses, fatigue and perception of female soccer players in small-sided games with different pitch size and sport surfaces. Biol Sport, 35(3), 291-299. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2018.77829

Meyers, M. C. (2017). Incidence, mechanisms, and severity of match-related collegiate men’s soccer injuries on FieldTurf and natural grass surfaces: a 6-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med, 45(3), 708-718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516671715

Modric, T., Esco, M., Perkovic, S., Basic, Z., Versic, S., Morgans, R., & Sekulic, D. (2023). Artificial turf increases the physical demand of soccer by heightening match running performance compared with natural grass. J Strength Cond Res, 37(11), 2222-2228. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004539

Nédélec, M., McCall, A., Carling, C., Le Gall, F., Berthoin, S., & Dupont, G. (2013). Physical performance and subjective ratings after a soccer-specific exercise simulation: comparison of natural grass versus artificial turf. J Sports Sci, 31(5), 529–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.738923

O’Meagher, R., O’Reilly, J., & Ali, A. (2022). The effect of different playing surfaces on soccer skill performance. Int J Sports Sci Coach, 17(6), 1378-1384. https://doi.org/10.1177/174795412110663

Owen, A. L., Wong, D. P., Paul, D., & Dellal, A. (2012). Effects of a periodized small-sided game training intervention on physical performance in elite professional soccer. J Strength Cond Res, 26(10), 2748-2754. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e318242d2d1

Ponce-Bordón, J. C., Polo-Tejada, J., Sanabria-Pino, B., Rubio-Morales, A., García-Calvo, T., & Lobo-Triviño, D. (2024). The influence of the playing surface on workload response in spanish professional male soccer players. Sensors (Basel), 24(14), 4506. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24144506

Rago, V., Rebelo, A. N., Pizzuto, F., & Barreira, D. (2016). Small-sided soccer games on sand are more physically demanding but less technically specific compared to games on artificial turf. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 58(4), 385-391. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06708-6

Santos, R., Dias, C., Garganta, J., & Costa, I. (2013). Does playing surface influence the tactical performance of soccer players? Rev Educ Fis UEM, 24(2), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.4025/reveducfis.v24.2.17965

Sarmento, H., Clemente, F. M., Harper, L. D., Costa, I. T. da, Owen, A., & Figueiredo, A. J. (2018). Small sided games in soccer – a systematic review. Int J Perf Anal Spor, 18(5), 693–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2018.1517288

Sassi A, Stefanescu A, Bosio A, Riggio M, Rampinini E, 2011. The cost of running on natural grass and artificial turf surfaces. J Strength Cond Res, 25, 3, 606-611. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c7baf9

Soligard, T., Bahr, R., & Andersen, T. E. (2012). Injury risk on artificial turf and grass in youth tournament football. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 22(3), 356-361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01174.x

Soylu, Y., Arslan, E., & Kilit, B. (2022). Psychometric properties of the brunel mood scale in Turkish adults and adolescents athletes. Spormetre Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 20(2), 56-67. https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.1060329

Soylu, Y., Arslan, E., & Kilit, B. (2023). Exercise and enjoyment: a scale adaptation study for adolescents and adults athletes. Spormetre Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 21(1), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.1183236

Soylu, Y., Chmura, P., Arslan, E., & Kilit, B. (2025). Intra-and inter-format variability of psychophysiological and technical responses in different small-sided soccer game formats: A repeated measures study. Int J Sports Sci Coach, 20(5), 1987-1996. https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541251341391

Stølen, T., Chamari, K., Castagna, C., & Wisløff, U. (2005). Physiology of soccer: an update. Sports Med, 35(6), 501-536. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200535060-00004

Wundersitz, D. W., Staunton, C. A., Gordon, B. A., & Kingsley, M. I. (2021). The influence of playing surface on external demands and physiological responses during a soccer match simulation. J Sports Sci, 39(24), 2869-2877. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2021.1976472

Downloads

Published

18.01.2026

How to Cite

Torbalı, G., Gök, U., Gök, Y., & Canikli, A. (2026). Effects of playing surface on physiological, technical, and mood parameters in 5v5 small-sided soccer games in youth players. Advances in Health and Exercise, 6(1), 7–14. Retrieved from https://www.turkishkinesiology.com/index.php/ahe/article/view/223

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles